การศึกษาอิสระ คณะนิติศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยทักษิณ

ง บทคัดย่อภาษาอังกฤษ Abstract Independent study Title : The Mediation in the Administrative Dispute of Autonomous University Student's Name : Miss KANYAPACH DULYAPACH Advisory Committee : Professor Dr. KORAKOD TONGKACHOK Degree and Program : Master of Laws in Laws Academic Year : 2022 This research was conducted to study the mediation of administrative disputes at autonomousuniversities, regarding concepts, theories, principles, and Thai and International laws. The research aimed to establish appropriate procedures for the mediation of administrative disputes at autonomous universities. This qualitative study was conducted using both documents and in-depth interviews. The research revealed that mediation of administrative disputes in Thai law is different, when compared to French law. In French law, the parties are allowed to delegate persons other than Administrative Court judges to act as mediators, whereas in Thai law only Administrative Court judges can be mediators in a dispute. There are 3 types of disputes in universities that can be mediated, those being; 1) before taking any disciplinary action, which relate to violations of codes of conduct, good governance, ethics and tort liability, in cases of neglect of duty, unreasonable delay in performing duties, or committing administrative violations, 2) during appeals and complaints, such as when employees at autonomous universities consider that they have not been treated fairly, or have grievances due to the actions or orders of their superiors, 3) disputes over administrative contracts, before bringing cases to the administrative court. There are 2 types of disputes that cannot be mediated; firstly, when a chancellor has already used discretion to issue an administrative ruling, and secondly, acts violating public order, good morals, or in