full2011_inter.pdf - page 46

2011 International Conference on Alternative Energy in Developing Countries and Emerging Economies
- 46 -
Fig. 3. The effect of external resistance on electricity generation
of Thai microbial fuel cell.
IV. C
ONCLUSION
The optimum condition of Thai MFC operation
of the POME treatment was illustrated when fed
neutral culture into the reactor at 30 g COD/l/day
HRT 1.04 day and aerated at 100 ml/min. The
maximum COD removal was 26.60 gCOD/l/day
higher than the exist wastewater treatment
technologies over 3-25 times. It is possible to scale
up to an economic scale.
A
CKNOWLEDGEMENT
Financial support by National Research
Council of Thailand, 2009.
R
EFERENCES
[1] APHA, AWA, WPCF. 1995. Standard
Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater, 19
th
ed. Washington DC:
American Public Health Association.
[2] Cheng, J., Zhu, X., Ni, J. and Borthwick, A.
2010.
Palm oil mill effluent treatment
using a two-stage microbial fuel cell system
integrated with immobilized biological aerated
filters. Bioresource Technol. 101
(
8
)
: 2729-
2734.
[3] Feng, Y., Yang, Q., Wang, X. and Logan, B.
E. 2010. Treatment of carbon fiber brush
anodes for improving power generation in air-
cathode microbial fuel cells. J. Power Sources.
195: 1841-1844.
[4] Jang, J.K., Pham, T.H., Chang, I.S., Kang,
K.H., Moon, H., Cho, K.S. and Kim, B.H.
2004. Construction and operation of a novel
mediator and membrane-less microbial fuel
cell. Process Biochem. 39: 1007-1012.
[5] Biomass One-stop Clearing House (2003).
“Introduction to conversion of Biomass to
Electricity
and Thermal Energy”. Available online:
[6] Borja, R., et al. (1996), Anaerobic treatment of
palm oil mill effluent in a two-stage up-flow
anaerobic sludge blanket system,
Biotechnology
,
45, pp. 125-135.
[7]
Malasian Palm Oil Board (2000). “ Oil
Palm
and the Environment”. Available online:
Rao, Peram M. (1999),
Wastewater Management in
a Palm Oil Mill: a case study,
M.Eng. Thesis,
d c b a
0
50
100
6 15 30 45
% COD removal
InfluentCOD concentration (g/l)
A
a
b c
0
50
100
0.35 1.04 2.08
% COD removal
Hydraulic retention time (HRT)
B
1...,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45 47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,...354
Powered by FlippingBook