full2010.pdf - page 1850

1812
P94
£µ¡Á«¦¬“„·‹‡¦´ªÁ¦º °œ :„¦–¸«¹„¬µ ®¤¼nš¸É 1 ˜Îµ¨žµÁ¤´ °ÎµÁ£°»Å®ŠÃ„-¨„ ‹´Š®ª´—œ¦µ›·ªµ­
Household Economy : A Case Study of Moo 1 Pasemus Sub-district
Suhaiko-lok Distrcit , Narativas Province
¼¨¸¦´˜œr ‡ŠÁ¦º°Š1 * ¨³»£µ–¸ „µ‹œªœ·„»¨ 2
Chuleerat Kongruang1* and Supanee Kanjanawanitchakul2
š‡´—¥n °
Á«¦¬“„·‹‡¦´ªÁ¦º °œÁž} œ¦µ„“µœÁ«¦¬“„·‹ °Šµ˜· „µ¦ª·‹´¥Á„¸É ¥ª„´ Á«¦¬“„·‹‡¦´ ªÁ¦º °œ‹¹Šœ´ ªnµ¤¸
‡ªµ¤Îµ‡´¥·ÉŠÁ¡¦µ³nª¥Ä®oš¦µ™¹Š™µœ³Âšo ‹¦·Š °ŠÁ«¦¬“„·‹ °Šž¦³Áš« Šµœª·‹´¥œ¸Ê ¤¸ª´˜™»ž¦³Š‡rÁ¡ºÉ°ª· Á‡¦µ³®r
£µ¡šµŠÁ«¦¬“„·‹ °Š‡¦´ ªÁ¦º°œ ž{‹‹´¥š¸É ¤¸‡ªµ¤´¤¡´œ›r„´£µ¡Á«¦¬“„·‹ °Š‡¦´ ªÁ¦º°œÂ¨³š´ «œ‡˜·š¸É¤¸ ˜n°£µ¡
šµŠÁ«¦¬“„·‹ °Š‡¦´ªÁ¦º °œ Á„ȝ¦ª¦ª¤ o°¤¼¨‹µ„‡¦´ªÁ¦º°œš´Ê Š®¤—Äœ®¤¼nš¸É 1 ˜Î µ¨žµÁ¤´ °ÎµÁ£°» Å®ŠÃ„¨„
‹´Š®ª´—œ¦µ›·ªµ‹Îµœªœ 210 ‡¦´ ªÁ¦º°œ čo‡nµ™·˜· ¦o°¥¨³ ‡nµÁŒ¨¸É¥ n ªœÁ¸É¥ŠÁœ¤µ˜¦“µœ ¨³‡nµ™·˜·Å‡Â‡ª¦r
Ĝ„µ¦ª·Á‡¦µ³®ro°¤¼¨ Ÿ¨„µ¦ª·‹´¥¡ªnµ‡¦´ ªÁ¦º°œnªœÄ®n¤¸Â®¨nŠš¸É¤µ °Š¦µ¥Å—o‹µ„„µ¦ž¦³„°°µ¸¡šÎµž¦³¤Š
¨³¦´‹o µŠ ¤¸¦µ¥‹nµ¥‡nµ°µ®µ¦Áž}œ¦µ¥‹nµ¥®¨´ „ ‡¦´ªÁ¦º°œ¤¸„µ¦°°¤Ã—¥Á„È ÁŠ·œÅªo„´˜´ªÁ°Š¤µ„š¸É » — ¨³¤¸„µ¦„¼o¥º¤
ÁŠ·œ‹µ„›œµ‡µ¦°°¤·œÂ¨³Á¡ºÉ°œoµœµ˜· ¡¸Éœo °Š¤µ„š¸É »— nªœŸ¨„µ¦ª·Á‡¦µ³®rž{‹‹´ ¥š¸É¤¸‡ªµ¤´¤¡´ œ›r˜n°£µ¡šµŠ
Á«¦¬“„· ‹ °Š‡¦´ªÁ¦º °œ ¡ªnµ ¦³—´„µ¦«¹ „¬µ ‹Îµœªœ¤µ· „ ‹Îµœªœ‡œšÎµŠµœÂ¨³‹ÎµœªœŸ¼o¡¹ÉŠ¡·Š¤¸ ‡ªµ¤´¤¡´ œ›r
„´£µ¡šµŠÁ«¦¬“„·‹ °Š‡¦´ªÁ¦º °œ ‡¦´ªÁ¦º °œ¤¸š´ «œ‡˜·š¸É¤¸˜n°£µ¡šµŠÁ«¦¬“„·‹ °Š‡¦´ªÁ¦º °œ°¥¼nĜ¦³—´žµœ
„¨µŠÂ¨³¤¸¦³—´š´«œ‡˜·˜n°ž{®µÁ«¦¬“„·‹°¥¼n Ĝ¦³—´˜Éε
‡ÎµÎµ‡´ : Á«¦¬“„·‹‡¦´ªÁ¦º°œ ¦µ¥Å—o‡¦´ ªÁ¦º°œ ¦µ¥‹nµ¥‡¦´ªÁ¦º°œ „µ¦°°¤‡¦´ªÁ¦º°œ ®œ¸Ê ·œ‡¦´ªÁ¦º°œ
Abstract
Household economy is cited as the economic root of a country. Thus, the study on household economy is
very crucial because it provides the real and deep information about our country economy. This study aimed to
analyze household economy, to examine the factors relating to household economy and to evaluate the attitude of
households towards their economies. The data were collected from 210 households in Moo 1 Pasemus Sub-
district Suhaiko-lok District, Narathivas Province. Percentage, mean, standard deviation and Chi-squares were
employed to test the hypotheses. The results can be summarized as follows. The majority of the households’
1Ÿ¼onª¥«µ˜¦µ‹µ¦¥r —¦. ®œnª¥ª·‹´¥Á«¦¬“„·‹£µ‡Ä˜o ‡–³Á«¦¬“«µ˜¦r¨³¦·®µ¦›»¦„·‹ ¤®µª· š¥µ¨´¥š´„¬·– ª·š¥µÁ ˜Š ¨µ
Asst.Prof. Dr., Research Unit of Southern Economy, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Thaksin University.
*Corresponding author : Ú¦«´¡šr 074-311885-7 ˜n° 1803 Ú¦µ¦ 074- 443977 E-mail:chuleerat@tsu.ac.th
2 Á«¦¬“«µ˜¦´–”·˜ že„µ¦«¹„¬µ 2552.
B.Econ., 2009 Academic year.