เอกสารการประชุมวิชาการและเสนอผลงานวิจัย มหาวิทยาลัยทักษิณ ครั้งที่ 19 2552 - page 730

„µ¦ž¦³»
¤ª·
µ„µ¦Â¨³Áœ°Ÿ¨Šµœª·
‹´
¥ ¤®µª·
š¥µ¨´
¥š´
„¬·
– ‡¦´Ê
Šš¸É
19 ž¦³‹Î
µže
2552
Ÿ¨…°Šª·
›¸
„µ¦˜°œÅ„n
˜n
°¤¦¦™£µ¡„µ¦Ÿ¨·
˜…°ŠÅ„n
¡ºÊ
œÁ¤º
°Š¡´
œ›»r
—ŠÂ¨³¡´
œ›»r
‡°¨n
°œ
Effects of caponization produres on productive performances
of Red and Naked-Neck native chickens
ª·
«µ¨ °—šœ
1
ª¦ª·
š¥r
ª–·
µ£·
µ˜·
2
ō¥ª¦¦– ª´
•œ‹´
œš¦r
2
»
¡¦¦–¸
Á¸Ê
¥Â„o
ª
1
°o
°¥Ä‹…»
œ„Î
µÂ®Š
1
¨³¦´
˜œµ¡¦ ¬¦Á—
1
Visan Odton
1
, Worawit Wanicharpichart
2
, Chaiyawan wattanachant
2
, Rattanapon Sondat
1
,
Supanni Bikeaw
1
and Ooi-jai Kunkumhang
1
š‡´
—¥n
°
„µ¦«¹
„¬µª·
›¸
„µ¦˜°œÅ„n
˜n
°¤¦¦™£µ¡„µ¦Ÿ¨·
˜Å„n
¡ºÊ
œÁ¤º
°Š ªµŠÂŸœ„µ¦š—¨°ŠÂ 2x4 factorial with
one control in CRD ¤¸
10 ŽÊÎ
µ Ç ¨³ 1 ˜´
ª ž{
‹‹´
¥š¸É
1 ‡º
° ¡´
œ›»r
ńn
ŗo
„n
ńn
—Š ¨³Å„n
‡°¨n
°œ ž{
‹‹´
¥š¸É
2 ª·
›¸
„µ¦˜°œ 4
ª·
›¸
‡º
° Á¡«Ÿ¼o
˜°œÂ {
Š±°¦r
äœ Á¡«Ÿ¼o
˜°œÂŸn
µ…o
µŠ ńn
Á¡«Ÿ¼o
˜°œ—o
ª¥„µ¦Á¦·
¤„ªµªÁ‡¦º
°…µª 2% Ĝ°µ®µ¦
¨³Á¡«Ÿ¼o
×¥¤¸
ńn
Á¡«Á¤¸
¥Áž}
œ„¨»n
¤‡ª‡»
¤ šÎ
µ„µ¦…»
œÅ„n
Áž}
œÁª¨µ 8 ´
ž—µ®r
Ÿ¨„µ¦«¹
„¬µ¡ªn
µÄœn
ªŠ 0-4 ´
ž—µ®r
…°Š„µ¦š—¨°Š ńn
Á¡«Ÿ¼o
˜°œÂ {
Š±°¦r
䜤¸
œÊÎ
µ®œ´
„˜´
ªÁ¡·É
¤Â¨³°´
˜¦µ„µ¦Áž¨¸É
¥œ°µ®µ¦Áž}
œœÊÎ
µ®œ´
„˜´
ª—¸
„ªn
µÅ„n
Á¡«Ÿ¼o
˜°œÂŸn
µ…o
µŠ ¨³Å„n
Á¡«Ÿ¼o
˜°œÁ¦·
¤„ªµªÁ‡¦º
°…µª (P<0.01) ˜n
Ĝn
ªŠ 4-8 ¨³ 0-8 ´
ž—µ®r
…°Š„µ¦
š—¨°Š ńn
Á¡«Ÿ¼o
˜°œš´Ê
Š 3 ª·
›¸
¤¸
¤¦¦™£µ¡„µ¦Á˜·
Ã˜Å¤n
˜„˜n
µŠ„´
œ (P>0.05) n
ªœ‡»
–£µ¡Žµ„Å„n
š¸É
8 ´
ž—µ®r
¡ªn
µ Áž°¦r
ÁŽÈ
œ˜r
Ņ¤´
œn
°Ššo
°Š…°ŠÅ„n
Á¡«Ÿ¼
o
˜°œÂ {
Š±°¦r
䜼
Š„ªn
µ„¨»n
¤°ºÉ
œ°¥n
µŠ¤¸
ϫ
¥Î
µ‡´
¥·É
Š (P<0.01)
‡Î
µÎ
µ‡´
 :
ńn
¡ºÊ
œÁ¤º
°Š ńn
˜°œ ¤¦¦™£µ¡„µ¦Ÿ¨·
˜ ‡»
–£µ¡Žµ„
Abstract
Effects of caponization produres on productive performances of native chickens were studied. Using
2x4 factorial with one control in CRD. There were two type of native chicken ; Red and Naked-Neck chicken and
method of caponization were surgical castration (SC), hormonal implantation (HI) and supplemented with 2% of
Pueraria mirifica
in powder (PM) and male (M) compared control group (female ; F) at 14-22 week of age were
studies.It was found that, during 0-4 week of experiment, HI group has significantly greater body weight gain and
better feed conversion ratio than did chickens iwith other tratmenttrea. However, no significantly different
(P>0.05) in any productive performances were found among treatment during 4-8 and 0-8 week of experiment. In
term of carcass quality,no significawe HI had significantly different) highepercentage of abdominal fat in chicken
with HI was significantly different (P<0.01) than those of other treatments.
Keywords :
native chicken, caponization, growth, carcass quality
1
Faculty of Technology and community development, Thaksin University, Papayom, Patthalung, 93110.
2
Department of animal science, Faculty of Natural Resource, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90112.
1...,720,721,722,723,724,725,726,727,728,729 731,732,733,734,735,736,737,738,739,740,...1457
Powered by FlippingBook