full2010.pdf - page 46

8
Table 2. Intake and apparent nutrient digestibility coefficient of dietary treatments consumed by goats.
Urea level (U)
Microbial
SEM
Contrast
Items
0 (U
0
)
2
4
inoculation (M)
U
0
vs
U
U
0
vs
M
U vs M
Total DM intake
g/d
507.96
450.41
410.17
534.96
56.76 ns
ns
ns
g/BW
0.75
/d
55.83
49.91
45.65
56.11
5.59
ns
ns
ns
Concentrate intake
g/d
166.69
168.51
164.49
174.36
14.41 -
-
-
g/BW
0.75
/d
18.25
18.68
18.64
18.09
0.52
-
-
-
OPF intake
g/d
341.27
281.89
245.67
360.60
52.08 ns
ns
ns
g/BW
0.75
/d
37.58
31.22
27.01
38.02
5.73
ns
ns
ns
Total CP intake
g/d
62.75
73.22
77.38
65.22
9.28
ns
ns
ns
g/BW
0.75
/d
6.90
8.20
8.66
6.79
0.81
ns
ns
ns
Digestibility coefficient (%)
DM
55.61
58.23
63.96
59.21
3.53
ns
ns
ns
CP
62.80
72.31
76.91
61.74
4.16
*
ns
**
NDF
39.90
47.09
54.25
43.42
4.42
*
ns
ns
ADF
34.24
46.00
48.86
36.83
3.32
***
ns
**
¦»
žŸ¨„µ¦ª·
‹´
¥
‹µ„Ÿ¨„µ¦š—¨°Šš¸É
ŗo
„¨n
µª¤µÂ¨o
ª…o
µŠ˜o
œ ¦»
žÅ—o
ªn
µ „µ¦Äo
¥¼
Á¦¸
¥Äœ¦³—´
 2 ¨³ 4 Áž°¦r
ÁŽÈ
œ˜r
…°ŠœÊÎ
µ®œ´
„
—Äœ„µ¦ž¦´
ž¦»
Š‡»
–£µ¡šµŠÄžµ¨r
¤š¸É
´
Ä®o
¤¸
…œµ— 1 – 2 ÁŽœ˜·
Á¤˜¦ ¤o
ªn
µÅ¤n
¤¸
Ÿ¨šÎ
µÄ®o
¡³„·
œª´
˜™»
®o
ŠÅ—o
Á¡·É
¤…¹Ê
œ ˜n
µ¤µ¦™Á¡·É
¤´
¤ž¦³·
š›r
„µ¦¥n
°¥Å—o
…°ŠÃž¦˜¸
œ®¥µ Ÿœ´
ŠÁŽ¨ ¨³ ¨·
„ÃœÁŽ¨¨¼
è Á¤ºÉ
°Áž¦¸
¥Áš¸
¥„´

„µ¦Äo
‹»
¨·
œš¦¸
¥r
¨³„µ¦Å¤n
čo
µ¦Á¦·
¤Ä—Ç „¨n
µªÅ—o
ªn
µ„µ¦Äo
¥¼
Á¦¸
¥ž¦´
ž¦»
Š‡»
–£µ¡šµŠžµ¨r
¤¤¸
Ÿ¨šÎ
µÄ®o
¡³Å—o
¦´

µ¦°µ®µ¦˜n
µŠÇ Á¡·É
¤…¹Ê
œ
‡Î
µ…°‡»
–
Šµœª·
‹´
¥œ¸Ê
ŗo
¦´
š»
œœ´
œ»
œ‹µ„ÁŠ·
œ¦µ¥Å—o
‡–³´
˜ª«µ˜¦r
¨³Áš‡ÃœÃ¨¥¸
„µ¦Á„¬˜¦ ¤®µª·
š¥µ¨´
¥
«·
¨žµ„¦ ª·
š¥µÁ…˜µ¦œÁš«Á¡¦»
¦¸
1...,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45 47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,...2023
Powered by FlippingBook