เอกสารการประชุมวิชาการและเสนอผลงานวิจัย มหาวิทยาลัยทักษิณ ครั้งที่ 19 2552 - page 515

„µ¦ž¦³»¤ª·µ„µ¦Â¨³Áœ°Ÿ¨Šµœª·‹´¥ ¤®µª·š¥µ¨´¥š´„¬·– ‡¦´ÊŠš¸É 19 ž¦³‹Îµže 2552
10
‹Îµœªœ o° °ŠÁ‡¦ºÉ°Š¤º°ª´— ¤¸‹Î µœªœ¦³®ªnµŠ 7–860 ‡œ ¨³ 5–80 o° ˜µ¤¨Îµ—´ œ°„‹µ„œ¸Ê ¤¸Šµœª·‹´ ¥ ‹Îµœªœ 25
Á¦ºÉ°Š š¸É čo„¦°Âœª‡·—Á¦ºÉ°Šš´„¬³„µ¦‡·—ª·‹µ¦–µ– °Š Robert H. Ennis Ĝ„µ¦¦o µŠÁ‡¦ºÉ°Š¤º°ª´— —´Šœ´ÊœŠµœª·‹´¥
š´Ê Š 25 Á¦ºÉ°Šœ¸Ê ŗo ™¼„œÎµ¤µÄoĜ„µ¦ª·Á‡¦µ³®r °£·¤µœ ץčoÁš‡œ·‡ Reliability Generalization (RG) ÁœºÉ°Š‹µ„Ÿ¼oª·‹´¥
Á®È œªn µ Á‡¦ºÉ °Š¤º°š´Ê Š®¤—œ¸Ê ¤¸Ã‡¦Š¦o µŠÂ¨³ª´—Äœ·É ŠÁ—¸¥ª„´ œ ¨³ÄœŠµœª·‹´ ¥ 25 Á¦ºÉ °Šœ´Êœ ¤¸„µ¦¦µ¥Šµœ‡nµ
´¤ž¦³·š›·Í°¨¢µ Á¡¸¥Š 14 ‡nµ —´Šœ´Êœ ‡n µ´¤ž¦³·š›·Í°¨¢µ—´Š„¨nµª ŗo™¼„œÎµ¤µÄo×¥ RG Ÿ¨„µ¦«¹ „¬µ ¡ªnµ
˜´ªÂž¦š¸É nŠŸ¨˜n °‡nµ´¤ž¦³· š›·Í‡ªµ¤ÁºÉ °¤´Éœ¤µ„š¸É »— ‡º ° ‹Î µœªœ„¨»n¤˜´ ª°¥n µŠš¸Éčo Ĝ„µ¦¡´•œµÁ‡¦ºÉ°Š¤º °
¦°Š¨Š¤µ‡º° ‹Îµœªœ o° °ŠÁ‡¦ºÉ°Š¤º°ª´—
‡Îµ °‡»–
Šµœª· ‹´¥œ¸Êŗo¦´š»œœ´œ» œ‹µ„εœ´„Šµœ‡–³„¦¦¤„µ¦„µ¦°» —¤«¹„¬µ¦nª¤„´Îµœ´„Šµœ„°Šš»œœ´œ» œ
„µ¦ª· ‹´¥ £µ¥Ä˜o ǦŠ„µ¦ äÁ—¨Á·ŠµÁ®˜» °Šž{ ‹‹´¥µŠž¦³„µ¦š¸É nŠŸ¨˜n °š´„¬³„µ¦‡· —ª· ‹µ¦–µ–
(MRG 5180351) ž¦³‹Îµže 2551
Á°„µ¦°oµŠ°·Š
Henson, R. K., & Thompson, B. (2001, April). “ Characterizing measurement error in test scores across studies:
A tutorial on conducting “reliability generalization” analyses,” Paper presented at the annual meeting
of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle, WA.
Caruso, J. C. (2000). “ Reliability generalization of the NEO personality scales,” Educational and Psychological
Measurement. 60, 236–254.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research
findings. (1st ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2000). “ Fixed effects vs. random effects meta-analysis models: Implications for
cumulative research knowledge,” International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 8, 275–292.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research
findings. (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Michael C. Rodriguez and Yukiko Maeda. (2006). “Meta-Analysis of Coefficient Alpha,” Psychological
Methods. Vol. 11, No. 3, 306–322.
Thompson, B., & Vacha-Haase, T. (2000). “ Psychometrics is data metrics: The test is not reliable,” Educational
and Psychological Measurement. 60, 174–195.
Vacha-Haase, T. (1998). “ Reliability generalization: Exploring variance in measurement error affecting score
reliability across studies,” Educational and Psychological Measurement. 58, 6–20.
Zangaro, George A; Soeken, (2005). "Meta-Analysis of the Reliability and Validity of Part B of the Index of Work
Satisfaction Across Studies," Journal of Nursing Measurement. HighBeam Research. (May 1, 2009).
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-931222531.html