full2010.pdf - page 722

684
O82
Ÿ¨ °Š„µ¦ f„‡· —®¤ª„®„ĝš¸É¤¸˜n°„µ¦‡·—°¥nµŠ¤¸ª·‹µ¦–µ– °Šœ´„Á¦¸¥œ´Êœž¦³™¤«¹„¬µžeš¸É 5
«¼œ¥rÁ‡¦º° n µ¥šnµœ³ 2 (š³Á¨š°Š) εœ´„ŠµœÁ ˜¡ºÊœš¸É „µ¦«¹„¬µ»¦µ¬‘¦r ›µœ¸ Á ˜ 2
Effects ofThinkingTrainingof SixThinkingHatsModel onCriticalThinkingof Prathommasuksa5
StudentsinThachana2NetworkCenter(Talaetong)UnderSuratthaniEducationServiceAreaOffice2
›ª´´¥ ¨µ¥¡¥´‡‰r 1*
Thawatchai Laipayak1*
š‡´—¥n °
„µ¦ª·‹´¥Äœ‡¦´ÊŠœ¸Ê Áž}œ„µ¦ª· ‹´¥Á·Šš—¨°Š ¤¸ª´˜™»ž¦³Š‡rÁ¡ºÉ°Áž¦¸¥Áš¸¥„µ¦‡·—°¥n µŠ¤¸ª·‹µ¦–µ– °Šœ´ „Á¦¸¥œ
´Êœž¦³™¤«¹ „¬µžeš¸É 5 „n °œÂ¨³®¨´ŠÅ—o¦´„µ¦ f„‡·—®¤ª„®„ĝ ¨³Áž¦¸¥Áš¸¥„´Á„–”rš¸É „ε®œ—¦o °¥¨³ 80
„¨»n¤˜´ª°¥nµŠš¸Éčo Ĝ„µ¦ª·‹´¥‡¦´ÊŠœ¸Ê ‡º° œ´ „Á¦¸¥œ´Êœž¦³™¤«¹„¬µže š¸É 5 æŠÁ¦¸¥œo µœš»nŠÁ¸¥œ ˜Îµ¨¤°š°Š °ÎµÁ£°šnµœ³
‹´Š®ª´—»¦µ¬‘¦r›µœ¸ £µ‡Á¦¸ ¥œš¸É 2 že„µ¦«¹„¬µ 2552 ŗo‹µ„ª·›¸„µ¦»n¤ÂÁž}œ„¨»n¤ ‹Îµœªœ 22 ‡œ Á‡¦ºÉ°Š¤º°š¸Éčo
Ĝ„µ¦Á„ȝ¦ª¦ª¤ o°¤¼¨ ž¦³„°—oª¥ÂŸœ„µ¦ f „‡·—®¤ª„®„ĝ‹Îµœªœ 10 Ÿœ š—°„µ¦‡·—°¥nµŠ
¤¸ª·‹µ¦µ– „µ¦ª·Á‡¦µ³®r o°¤¼¨„¦³šÎµÃ—¥®µ¦o°¥¨³ ‡n µÁŒ¨¸É¥ ‡nµÁ¸É¥ŠÁœ¤µ˜¦“µœ ¨³š—°¤¤»˜·“µœÃ—¥
čo‡nµš¸ (t-test)
Ÿ¨„µ¦ª· ‹´¥¡ªnµ
1. œ´ „Á¦¸¥œš¸Éŗo ¦´„µ¦ f„‡·—®¤ª„®„ĝ¤¸‡ªµ¤µ¤µ¦™Äœ„µ¦‡·—°¥nµŠ¤¸ª·‹µ¦–µ–®¨´ ŠÅ—o¦´„µ¦
f„‡·—®¤ª„®„ĝ¼Š„ªnµ„n°œÅ—o ¦´„µ¦ f„‡· —®¤ª„®„ĝ °¥nµŠ¤¸œ´ ¥Îµ‡´šµŠ™·˜·š¸É ¦³—´ .01
2. œ´„Á¦¸ ¥œš¸Éŗo¦´„µ¦ f„‡·—®¤ª„®„ĝ¤¸ ‡ªµ¤µ¤µ¦™Äœ„µ¦‡· —°¥nµŠ¤¸ª·‹µ¦–µ–ÁŒ¨¸É¥¦o°¥¨³
82.42 Ž¹ÉŠ¼Š„ªn µÁ„–”rš¸É„ε®œ—¦o°¥¨³ 80 °¥nµŠ¤¸œ´ ¥Îµ‡´ šµŠ™·˜·š¸É ¦³—´ .01
‡ÎµÎµ‡´ : „µ¦ f„‡· —®¤ª„®„ĝ „µ¦‡·—°¥nµŠ¤¸ª·‹µ¦–µ–
Abstract
The purposes of this study were: 1) to compare critical thinking of Prathommasuksa 5 students before and
after training by Six Thinking Hats model. 2) to compare critical thinking of the students to the prescribed
criterion at 80 percent
1œ· ·˜ž¦·µÃš µ µ„µ¦¡´•œµ®¨´„¼˜¦Â¨³„µ¦Á¦¸¥œ„µ¦°œ ‡–³‡¦»«µ˜¦r ¤®µª·š¥µ¨´¥¦µ£´’œ‡¦«¦¸›¦¦¤¦µ 80280
Master’sDegreeStudent,DepartmentofCurriculumandInstructionalDevelopment,FacultyofEducation,NakhonSiThammaratRajabhatUniversity80280
*Corresponding author : Ú¦«´¡šr/Ú¦µ¦ 083-3940626 E-mail:thawatchaije@hotmail.com