เอกสารการประชุมวิชาการและเสนอผลงานวิจัย มหาวิทยาลัยทักษิณ ครั้งที่ 19 2552 - page 498

„µ¦ž¦³»¤ª·µ„µ¦Â¨³Áœ°Ÿ¨Šµœª·‹´¥ ¤®µª·š¥µ¨´¥š´„¬·– ‡¦´ÊŠš¸É 19 ž¦³‹Îµže 2552
ABSTRACT
The purposes of this research were: 1) to compare the creative thinking of kindergarteners before and
after taught by the art activities accoroding to Williams’ model; 2) to compare the creative thinking of
kindergarteners before and after taught by the art activities accoroding to conventional approach and 3) to
compare the creative thinking of kindergarteners after taught by the art activities accoroding to Williams’ model
and taught by the art activities accoroding to conventional approach. The sample consisted of fifty
kindergarteners year one of Watboondharikkaram school, Tombon Bo Phut, Amphoe Ko Samai, Suratthani
Education Service Area Office 1, in second semester of 2008. The target group was divided into 2 groups;
experimental and control group. The research instruments used were: 1) the art activities accoroding to
Williams’ model plans; 2) the art activities accoroding to conventional approach plans and 3) Torrance test
of creative thinking figural from A. The collected data were analyzed into mean and standard deviation.
The t-test was utilized for comparison purposes.
The findings were:
1. The creative thinking of kindergarteners after they had been taught by the art activities
accoroding to Williams’ model plans was significantly higher than before at the level .01
2. The creative thinking of kindergarteners after they had been taught by the art activities
accoroding to conventional approach plans was significantly higher than before at the level .01
3. The creative thinking of kindergarteners after they had been taught by the art activities
accoroding to Williams’ model plans was significantly higher than the one that had been taught by the art
activities accoroding to conventional approach plans at the level .01
Keywords : Williams’ Model; Creative Thinking; Kindergarteners
‡Î µœÎµ
®¨´„¼˜¦„µ¦«¹„¬µž“¤ª´¥ ¡»š›«´„¦µ 2546 ŗo˜¦³®œ´„™¹Š‡ªµ¤Î µ‡´ °Š„µ¦‹´ —„µ¦«¹„¬µš¸É¤»nŠÁœo œ
„µ¦Á˜¦¸¥¤‡ªµ¤¡¦o°¤š´ÊŠ 4 —o µœ ŗo„n—oµœ¦nµŠ„µ¥ —oµœ°µ¦¤–r-‹·˜Ä‹ —oµœ´Š‡¤Â¨³—oµœ˜·ž{ µ ×¥¼¦–µ
„µ¦„µ¦Á¦¸¥œ¦¼oŸnµœ„µ¦Á¨nœ Ä®o Á—È„¤¸š´ „¬³Äœ„µ¦ÂªŠ®µ‡ªµ¤¦¼o ¤¸‡ªµ¤µ¤µ¦™Äœ„µ¦‡·— „µ¦Â„ož{ ®µ¦ª¤š´ÊŠ¤¸
‹·œ˜œµ„µ¦Â¨³¤¸‡ªµ¤‡· —¦oµŠ¦¦‡rš¸É Á®¤µ³¤„´ª´ ¥ („¦³š¦ªŠ«¹„¬µ›· „µ¦, 2546, ®œoµ 8-9) 宦´‡ªµ¤‡·—
¦oµŠ¦¦‡rÁž}œ‡ªµ¤µ¤µ¦™šµŠ„µ¦Äo ¤°ŠÂ¨³Áž}œ‡ªµ¤˜o°Š„µ¦¼Š»— °Š¤œ»¬¥r Áž}œš´„¬³š¸É‡ª¦¤¸ °¥¼nĜ»‡‡¨
š» „‡œÂ¨³µ¤µ¦™š¸É ‹³¡´•œµÄ®o ¼ Š ¹Ê œÅ—oĜ˜´ ª» ‡‡¨š»„‡œ ×¥°µ«´¥„µ¦Á¦¸¥œ¦¼o ¨³„µ¦‹´ —¦¦¥µ„µ«š¸É
Á°ºÊ°°Îµœª¥ ™o µÅ—of„n°¥Ç ‡ªµ¤‡·—¦oµŠ¦¦‡r‹³—¸¹Êœ (Á„¨¨r Gale, 1988, pp. 24 ; °oµŠ™¹ŠÄœ °µ¦¸ ¡´œ›r¤–¸ , 2544,
®œo µ 1) „µ¦¡´•œµ‡ªµ¤‡·—¦oµŠ¦¦‡ršÎ µÅ—o×¥„µ¦°œ „µ¦ f„ œ ¨³„µ¦ž’·´˜·š¸É™¼„ª·›¸ ®µ„Á—È„Å—o ¦´„µ¦